|Amoebozoa has been listed as a level-4 vital article in Science. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as Start-Class.|
|WikiProject Microbiology||(Rated Start-class, Top-importance)|
|WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology||(Rated Start-class, High-importance)|
Number of Species
This page should say how many species are in this phylum. --Savant13 20:31, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
At the time, there were general questions about how categories should work for taxa. I've replaced it. Josh
The image placement is ridiculous! It states "Amoeba proteus", but when you click on the image, the file is called "Chaos diffluens"! Two clearly different species, different genera even! There are plenty of real photos of amoeba proteus out there - a correct one should be used here. 184.108.40.206 22:14, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Amoeba proteus = Chaos diffluens ?
Amoeba proteus and Chaos diffluens are synonyms?
- "Many synonyms exist for Amoeba proteus. (Mast and Johnson, 1931). However, the only other name used today is Chaos diffluens, proposed by Schaeffer in 1926. Amoeba proteus can be distinguished from two similar species, Amoeba dubia and Amoeba discoides, by ...", . 220.127.116.11 17:56, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Taxobox colour change
After much discussion, it has been agreed that colour changes for taxoboxes are necessary; it's currently proposed that amoebozoa taxoboxes should become #FFC8A0 and rhizaria, lavender. These changes would be carried out automatically, determined by regnum/phylum/etc entries in the taxobox. Your comments and opinions would be gratefully received here!
Kingdom or not?
As far as I know, this is not a kingdom, but rather a group within protists. In fact, it seems that many new kingdoms of eukaryotes have been added, when before there were just animals, plants, fungi, and protists. What's happening? Is there some new taxonomic descision I should know about? 18.104.22.168 (talk) 16:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- You are right. In fact, the authority given for this group (Luhe 1913, emend. Thomas Cavalier-Smith, 1998) classifies it as a phylum, under Kingdom Protozoa ( see: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9809012 ). Every taxonomical authority I am aware of classifies Amoebozoa either as a phylum, or as an unranked supragenic taxon (as in the ISOP system). I think the problem here originates in an eccentricity of the automatic taxobox template, which seems to insist on classifying Amoebozoa as a kingdom. The simplest solution is to switch to the ordinary taxobox template, which permits us to classify Amoebozoa either as a phylum under Protozoa, or as an "unranked_phylum" (with no kingdom specified, as preferred by ISOP). Deuterostome (talk) 14:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
= "List of amoeboid protozoa pathogenic to humans" mistake
Naegleria is not an amoebozoan but an Excavata member. Excavata are not even closely related to amoebozoan since they are Bikonts (like plants and algae) while amoebozoa are unikonts (like fungi and animals). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 14:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Can someone define an amoeba?
Could a knowledgeable person please define the terms amoeba and the plural amoebae as used on this page? Does it refer to any member of the Amoebozoa, i.e., to a species, or does it refer to a particular type of cell such as the amoeboid stage of a slime mold (or to both)? This explanation is also needed on the page Amoeba (disambiguation). Thanks. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 21:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)