Talk:Amon Bazira

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Africa / Rwanda / Uganda (Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Rwanda (marked as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Uganda (marked as Mid-importance).
 
WikiProject Biography / Politics and Government (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
 

This page is nothing but praise for Amon Bazira and anger towards other nations, and the only source cited is the "African Unification Front", definitely biased POV here, this page needs to be deleted.


Tag[edit]

I do agree that there is POV, and I have placed a neutrality tag on the article. Tameamseo (talk) 20:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

The page does have a number of tags; however, the gentleman is significant. He does deserve a wikipedia page, even if this one can be enhanced. I have assessed it start class and mid importance, though some considering his Pan Africanism and involvement in Ugandan politics could prefer a high importance rating.Gallador (talk) 17:42, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
I agree as regards significance and I've removed the notability tag, but I think the other problems remain. Tameamseo (talk) 18:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
I have cut the vast majority of the article. There are so many issues with the existing text, I judge it easier to start over. If anyone wants to use the old text, please add references and reword for neutrality before reinserting. Thanks, BanyanTree 09:54, 6 June 2009 (UTC)