|Ideal sources for Wikipedia's medical content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Anal cancer.
|WikiProject Medicine||(Rated C-class, Mid-importance)|
Is a photograph of an anus as the main picture absolutely necessary?
The MacMillan page on this subject manages without one. The Cancer Research UK page manages without. I doubt any of the the major sites would use this picture as prominently. This is not helping for putting over information - it is not a site for professionals. It's astonishing that someone would think this be a good idea...(unsigned)
How about some information either for or against about alternative therapies such as the ones used on Farrah Fawcett. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 19:25, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
These were added to external links
- #10 - Links to social networking sites (Outwithcancer.com)
- #1 - Does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a Featured article. (Lgbtcancer.com)
- #13 - Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject (Both - these are general cancer cites, not specific to Anal cancer, lgbtcancer appears to have very little coverage of anal cancer.) Zodon (talk) 09:49, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Fawcett in the intro
The introductory paragraphs have seemingly excessive info on Farrah Fawcett's struggle with and eventual death from anal cancer. While her publicized diagnoses might warrant a mention somewhere in the article, this detailed description of her illness and career belongs in her own wiki article, not here. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 03:33, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Citation for saying that all (100%) cases of anal cancer in homosexual males contain HPV should be verified as these statistics are highly improbable. Citation source credited as Danish Medical Bulletin. 2002 Aug;49(3):194-209
- Lists of notable people with common diseases sounds like a terrible idea. -- Banjeboi 17:32, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
requires staging (TNM) as it is mentioned in the article, but not described
Risk factors misstated
The article states that "Receptive anal intercourse, whether male or female, increases the chances of anal cancer sevenfold." It cites "Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Changing Trends in Sexual Behavior May Explain Rising Incidence of Anal Cancer Among American Men and Women" . Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (fhcrc.org}. 2004-07-06. Retrieved 2010-04-21.
The citation states that "Among the male cases studied, nearly half reported that they were not exclusively heterosexual. Among these men, a history of receptive anal intercourse and a history of 15 or more sexual partners each increased the risk of anal cancer sevenfold." I could find no reference to a seven-fold increase in risk among women, whether due to anal sex or anything else.
I suggest that the sentence in the article be removed, or be modified to refer only to men, and to include the fact that it's the combination of receptive anal intercourse AND a history of 15 or more sexual partners causing the increase, and not the receptive anal intercourse alone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 17:32, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Anal sex does not cause anal cancer. It is HPV infection from anal sex that can lead to an increased risk of anal cancer. The act of anal sex alone is not proven to increase the risk of anal cancer. This and the anal sex article on wikipedia is presenting this information incorrectly.
The intro says it is caused by Rasengan. I've never heard of it before. Is that an actual condition, or is it wiki vandalism (it's a ninja move in Naruto)? If nobody can provide a source I say we should remove it. BrotherSulayman (talk) 01:35, 16 March 2011 (UTC)