This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
I know that this is regarded as an important text in anarchist literature, but the current summary isn't really instructive; it's too fragmented. Is there a rule or a useful precedent here? Should it be replaced with a detailed review of its contents? Je.est.un.autre (talk) 03:08, 21 June 2014 (UTC)