This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia's policies on "fair use" are totally bizarre. It's common legal knowledge that journalistic and informational projects can replicate a company's logo. Watch the TV news any time and you will see company logos used all of the time in news stories. In the case of Anarchy magazine, this discussion is all the more absurd and pointless given that Anarchy has an anti-copyright policy. Chuck0 21:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)