Talk:Animal locomotion
| WikiProject Organismal Biomechanics | (Rated B-class, Top-importance) | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
| Priority 5 | |||
Contents |
[edit] Diagram
Hi, can anyone give more information about what kind of diagram is desired? If anyone could post a link to a photo/scan of the diagram in Biology that would be very useful for illustrators. (see meta:Philip Greenspun illustration project/Round 1/Request list/17) thanks --pfctdayelise (talk) 01:16, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Graph now exists: commons:Image:Energy cost locomotion en.svg. --pfctdayelise (talk) 01:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Energetics
Please do not link to "aerobic" as it's a disambiguation page. Choose the correct usage from the page and link to that, or link to the Wiktionary definiton of the word. Thanks! You can help! Twirligig (talk) 21:14, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed project of interest - organismal biomechanics
Hi all, I'm trying to start a Wikiproject to cover Organismal Biomechanics, and I was wondering if anyone else would be interested? Articles such as animal locomotion. gait, muscle, and similar would be our targets. See my userpage for a list of what I'm planning to work on, including some truly awful articles in desperate need of attention. See proposal page at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Wikiproject_Organismal_Biomechanics. I'll keep anyone who signs up updated via their userpages until I get a project page made. Help of all kinds is appreciated, from brain dumps to wikifying, grammar and dealing with references. Mokele (talk) 01:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] New lead
As has been pointed out by Lambtron, there are some serious deficiencies in the intro. I took a whack at it before, and again just now, but it's still pretty unsatisfactory. Some aspects are just outright wrong (technically, movement isn't *essential* to survival since sessile organisms do just fine, but it is important), others are poorly phrased or insufficently explained. Any ideas? I figure it's overall structure should mirror the article and touch on key points such as energetics, terrestrial vs flight vs aquatic, generating forces, etc. Mokele (talk) 14:44, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- I reworked the intro paragraph; please have a look and revise as necessary when you have the time. Much more work to do here! Lambtron (talk) 20:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Human locomotion
why no human locomotion article ? --Penbat (talk) 20:38, 27 November 2010 (UTC)