Talk:Animal nutrition

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Food and drink (Rated Start-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
 
WikiProject Animals (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon Animal nutrition is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Veterinary medicine (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Copied?[edit]

Sounds like a scholarly article on nutrition by someone with no knowledge or experience of a nutrition. The clue? Nothing about balanced nutrition. 71.100.23.199 (talk) 17:43, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Militantly pro-carnivore[edit]

The tone of the whole article is militantly pro-carnivore. Of what use, for instance, is the violent picture of predation at the top? And why illustrate the paragraph on protein with a picture of meat, which adds nothing in content but just perpetuates the myth that protein is a meat thing? Not to mention the absurd caption - all meats contain all the amino acids, just as all plants do too. David Olivier (talk) 16:00, 3 January 2013 (UTC)