This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.
This page was nominated for deletion on 16 December 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This page was nominated for deletion on 25 November 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.
126.96.36.199 (talk) 02:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)We vehemently object to the deletion of Anisha Ambrose's biography on Wikipedia. Yes, she has, as of now only one produced role to her credit. We need to understand that the one produced role has got her an innumerable fan following. Moreover movies are not produced overnight. Given time she will have a lot more movies to her credit. So, please do not break the hearts of her fans ! Thankyou.188.8.131.52 (talk) 02:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
If you can show significant evidence that there is really a large fan following, something that grants her "cult" status, that would have some influence in the deletion discussion. --Nat Gertler (talk) 04:46, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
184.108.40.206 (talk) 14:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)In continuation, if we have as fan followers trespassed into your site please forgive , it will not be repeated at any level. It was done in goodwill and love.
This is no trespass; you have just as much right to edit Wikipedia as I do. In fact, you are free to go into the article and remove my call for deletion, an easy way to stop the WP:PROD deletion process. If you do that, I am likely to subject it to a more intense deletion process, WP:AFD, in which other editors will help judge whether the subject of the article passes our standards for inclusion, and if we go to that, you will be welcome to be part of the discussion. As for her fan club, the only reference I can find to one is here, and it lists her club as having no members.
Also please realize that even if we delete the article, that doesn't mean that she cannot have an article at some later time, assuming she continues to gain roles and recognition. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:08, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey Nat Gertler, or whoever you are???? You say that we can delete your call for deletion..... why do you need to say ...`If you do that I am likely to subject it to a more intense deletion process ???? Crazy ! Who brought up the article, and why did Wikipedia accept it ??IF criteria's as you have mentioned were NOT adhered to why was it published ?! Next, why are you Nat Gertler so huffed up now?! Seems you are BOUGHT and therefore project your senseless moods and thoughts ! Go Ahead and DARE !It doesn't make a difference. You will at the end, in time to come, find yourself putting your foot in your mouth! God Bless!!, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 15:45, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
The article was started by User:Avi.sagi. It was "accepted" because Wikipedia by default allows everything to be posted, then counts on editors like me to review new posts and catch ones that do not meet our criteria. This is just part of the process. I'm letting you know how the Wikipedia processes work so that you'll understand what is going on and so that, if there is a chance to save this article, you'll be able to do so... but that doesn't change the fact that, based on the evidence I've seen, Anisha Ambrose does not yet meet our guidelines for inclusion. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Mr Nat Gertler, I am User:Avi.sagi a novice wikipedia article writer. Sir when i created the page Anisha Ambrose, all the facts i have added were referenced to popular newspapers like Deccan chronicle and websites like rediff. later many first time authors edited the article with facts without proofs and not in a neutral point of view i have deleted all facts which are not referenced and which endorse a person. I would b grateful to know any mistakes or wrong doings in the way i have written the article. This is my first Wikipedia page of a person and finding famous person without a wiki page is tough to find these days so please help me in the learning curve of being a Wikipedia author, I hope I have expressed my views politely. —Preceding undated comment added 02:20, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I have responded on your user talk page. --Nat Gertler (talk) 03:00, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Anisha Ambrose has a large fan base of over 15000 followers. She has also by invitation been interviewed by many noted newspapers such as The Times, Times of India and by Indian based film newspapers in the U.S. Further she has also featured on the cover pages of magazines and is quite popular amongst the masses in her State . Therefore the proposed deletion on the basis `With only one produced role to her credit she fails the guidelines for notability for entertainers' lacks merit. The example of Paris Katherine Jackson is enough to substantiate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanju Ash (talk • contribs) 12:11, 22 November 2013 (UTC)