Talk:Anisocoria

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Ophthalmology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Anatomy: Gross Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Anisocoria.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Pharmacological agents[edit]

The article says "Some examples of pharmacological agents which may affect the pupils include pilocarpine, cocaine, tropicamide, MDMA, Dextromethorphan, and ergolines." But the source that's cited after it doesn't say anything about these substances. Most of them can dilate the pupil but that's not anisocoria. --Custoo (talk) 06:55, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

meaningless phrasing of statistics[edit]

"About 20% of normal people have a slight difference in pupil size which is known as physiological anisocoria"

who's "normal people"? also, what's a "slight difference"? does that exclude people with a large difference, with no difference, both, at what thresholds? this wording is completely meaningless. it's a non-linked source so i can't fix it.· Lygophile has spoken 12:26, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]