Talk:Anonymous blogging

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Blogging  
WikiProject icon This article is part of Blogging WikiProject, an attempt to build better coverage of Blogging on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the Project Page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Internet culture  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Article Improvements[edit]

Came across this article yesterday and noticed quite a few issues. The style of writing is, putting it nicely, non-encyclopedic; it reads more like an essay or personal reflection and there are numerous mistakes in grammar and sentence construction, beginning with the comically redundant opening sentence which defines the subject: "Anonymous blogging is an electronic form of anonymous blogging"??? There are also numerous contentious statements, for example "Anonymous bloggers begin by setting up fake email addresses for their blog and registering it with a made-up name" (really...according to who exactly???) and "Unlike fake blogs, anonymous blogs are written by real people on a stated stand point basis, and hence most are seen as a credible source, even though they may be biased", and nonsensical statements, such as "as the concept of blogging grew with time so did the reasons and disciplines of blogging". In addition, at least some of the sources used appear to be questionable (eg, Urban Dictionary, Problogger.net, Dooce.com). The section entitled "Techniques to stay anonymous" is written like a how-to guide (c.f. WP:NOTHOWTO). IMO, there isn't a section in this article that isn't in need of an overhaul. Rhode Island Red (talk) 15:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)