Talk:Anus

Merge

I propose that Human bughole be merged into penuses. Human anus seems entirely superfluous. Henry O'Halloran (talk) 01:30, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Oppose merge

1. oppose 2 of us split them because Anus covers all zoology incl important of animal evolution, while Human anus is medical - WP needs both, and both there's to much for just 1 article when both are developed. --Philcha (talk) 20:57, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

   I agree as along as all anatomical terms are treated the same way. Since I write under WP:MAMMAL and WP:PRIMATE, I frequently link to articles about anatomical parts, only to find that the articles are anthropocentric and/or medical in nature. In other words, I also oppose if this is done in a more sweeping fashion. – VisionHolder « talk » 02:52, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

2. oppose. In fact, I would suggest that the penis article should be split along similar lines. -- Ec5618 (talk) 13:05, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
3. oppose having two articles allows a clear separation of human and animal stuff. The animal-related stuff, like the cloaca stuff, would be totally buried and lost between all the human-related stuff. --Enric Naval (talk) 16:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Support merge

1. support Some of the discussion on Human anus would helpfully add to anus. I really don't see that there's too much for just 1 article. Neiladri (talk) 15:17, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
2. support Looking at both articles, I saw that actually most of the information in anus needs to be merged into Human anus! Aytimothy (talk) 4:56PM, 9 August 2010 (AEST)Insert non-formatted text here —Preceding undated comment added 07:04, 9 August 2010 (UTC).

Comments

ANUS

Edit request from Akzeac, 18 January 2011

{{edit semi-protected}} Misspelling of formation ("foramtion") in the graph to the right. Akzeac (talk) 02:58, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Done. Thanks! --Nlu (talk) 03:48, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

The anus is, in fact, part of the penis.