Talk:Apatura iris
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Needs review[edit]
I've strengthened the text and added references from the 'usual suspects', plus the important monograph on the species by Heslop et al.. It should be reviewed to see if it's no longer stub class.
I think this particular butterfly species should be of 'medium' importance to the Wiki Lepidoptera project because of its iconic status (it appears on the covers of several important UK butterfly books, including South) and the fact that it appears to be an 'indicator species' of woodland habitat quality in southern England and Wales. What do you think? --Wally Tharg (talk) 20:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Apatura iris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121011233013/http://butterfly-conservation.org/Butterfly/32/Butterfly.html?ButterflyId=8 to http://www.butterfly-conservation.org/Butterfly/32/Butterfly.html?ButterflyId=8
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:07, 16 October 2016 (UTC)