Talk:Apollonian circles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Mathematics (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject Mathematics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mathematics rating:
Start Class
Mid Importance
 Field: Geometry

First merger discussion[edit]

I would recommend that the pages of Apollonian circles not be merged with the Apollonian gasket, because they seem to be mathematically distinct. The Apollonian circles constitute two families of mutually orthogonal circles, and extend Apollonius' distance-ratio definition of the circle (see blurb in Circle). By contrast, the Apollonian gasket extends Apollonius' problem, which is to identify a circle that is tangent to three fixed circles. The circles in this case are tangent (not orthogonal) and are constructed by a different method to solve a different problem. The gasket looks nothing like the Apollonian circles, which correspond to the orthogonal bipolar coordinate system. The main thing they have in common is their inventor, Apollonius of Perga. WillowW 21:28, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Second merger discussion[edit]

— I'm willing to merge these articles on the Apollonian circles, the Circles of Apollonius and the Apollonian gasket, but I'll confess that the motivation is murky to me. Despite their similar name, these concepts seem as mathematically alien as "linear regression" and "linear dynamical system". Perhaps the motivating idea for merger is that non-professionals might become confused by their similar names? Or that we can make one good-length article from a handful of overly short articles? Please help me understand your reasoning. Willow 06:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Blue circles[edit]

Are the blue circles in the currently used image constructed by varying \lambda in k_A = \{X | \overline{AX} : \overline{XB} = \lambda\} (see de:Kreis des Apollonios)? Thanks, --Abdull 15:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes, you're exactly right, Abdull! :) I'm sorry that I didn't notice your message earlier. :( Apollonius defined a circle as the locus of points that have the same ratio of distances to two given foci. Interestingly, the red circles are the locus of points that subtend the same angle between the two foci; you might want to read up on the inscribed angle theorem. These two types of circles are perpendicular (they meet at right angles), which is the basis for bipolar coordinates, an important orthogonal coordinate system. Hoping that you enjoy geometry, too, :) Willow (talk) 22:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Third merger discussion[edit]

Here we are again at a merger discussion — or at least a merger monologue. ;) As clarified at the disambiguation page, Circles of Apollonius, Apollonius did a lot of work with various types of circles. Although he's not well-known today, he was one of the top three Greek geometers, along with Euclid and Archimedes. Meanwhile, I'm trying to bring one of those types of circles (the solutions to Apollonius' problem) to Featured Article status, and it would not be sensible for any of us to merge that article with other mathematical topics that are unrelated to it. I hope that this clarifies where we're headed with Apollonius and his circles; please consider helping out! :) Willow (talk) 21:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC)