Talk:Apostolic Age

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article nominee Apostolic Age was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
October 6, 2008 Good article nominee Not listed
WikiProject Christianity / Bible / Theology (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Bible (marked as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by theology work group (marked as Mid-importance).
 
WikiProject Religion  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

The age of apostolic deposit[edit]

As far as I can tell, this term or "Apostolic Era" is rarely used in the sense of Catholic and Orthodox apologetics, to refer to the entire period between Christ's comings (as this article uses it). It is used by Catholics as the Protestants also use it, to describe the period of time during which the Apostolic deposit was left once for all, to the Church.

The Catholic apologetic is not that we live now in the age of the apostles, the apostolic era, but that there is a line of succession, of trusteeship, that extends back from the present continuously all the way to the Apostolic age - and that therefore their church has preserved by the Holy Spirit the fullness of Apostolic authority. That is substantially different from what this article says, and therefore I've marked it with a disputed tag. — Mark (Mkmcconn) ** 01:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

GA goal[edit]

What does this article need to become a good article? Vassyana (talk) 05:37, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Cooperative editing would be a start. 75.15.193.12 (talk) 20:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

More focus on the break with Jewish Christianity is needed. - Ret.Prof (talk) 17:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
See List of events in early Christianity. 75.15.207.88 (talk) 18:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Apostolic Age[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Apostolic Age's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Harris":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 19:41, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Merge Apostolic Age into Origins of Christianity[edit]

See Talk:Split of early Christianity and Judaism#Merge. şṗøʀĸɕäɾłäů∂ɛ:τᴀʟĸ 23:23, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Citation?[edit]

In the section "The first gentile convert," I'd want the sentence "Some scholars assert that the Ethiopian eunuch..." to point to *which* scholars assert that. Maybe a [who?] tag there. But I don't know how to put that in, or whether it'd be appropriate in the first place, just starting here. :) If note #16 refers to such a source, that should be made clearer. Vondraco (talk) 03:44, 25 May 2012 (UTC) Vondraco