Talk:Apple Inc.
| ↓ | Skip to table of contents | ↓ |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Apple Inc. article. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 | |||
|
|
|||
| Apple Inc. was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is a former Macintosh collaboration. It was in the spotlight from December 11, 2005 to February 9, 2006. The Collaboration is managed by WikiProject Macintosh, an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles related to Apple Inc. and the Macintosh. |
This page has been mentioned by several media organizations. The references are in:
|
|
|
| Priority 1 (top) | |
| A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day... section on April 1, 2004, April 1, 2008, and April 1, 2010. |
Contents |
[edit] Brand value typos
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
At the end of the History section, the article states "Apple Inc. has also become the most valuable consumer-facing brand in the world with a 246 percent increased to $19.1 billion.[100]"
Actually, if you go to the source, that refers to Facebook. The sentence should read "84 percent increase to $153.3 billion". (Note that "increased" should be "increase." hello — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.242.118 (talk) 05:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Fixed Dbrodbeck (talk) 14:09, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
The typo hasn't fully been fixed. The typo now stands as "84 percent increase to $19.1 billion", which confuses the 84% jump of Apple with the $19.1 billion brand value of Facebook, according to the source mentioned above. The source gives Apple's brand value at $153.3 billion. Thus the numbers should be: 84% increase to $153.3 billion.
[edit] can we add in market capitalisation figure to company details box (top right of page)
here is a list of market capitalisation figures for 2011 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_corporations_by_market_capitalization http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_corporations_by_market_capitalization#2011
best to reference List_of_corporations_by_market_capitalization wiki page rather than the ref that List_of_corporations_by_market_capitalization page references!
here is the page for 'market capitalisation' it is basically the value/size of the company (number of shares inssued * current share price) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_capitalization
so i'd like to see
Market Capitalization 321.072 billion (2011) [1]
[edit] Siri
Regarding this sentence:
"On October 4, 2011, Apple announced the iPhone 4S, which includes an improved camera with 1080p video recording, a dual core A5 chip capable of 7 times faster graphics than the A4, a voice recognition system named Siri, and cloud-sourced data with iCloud."
Siri is not a voice recognition software, it is instead an "Intelligent software assistant", as stated in the first sentence of the Siri article and another sentence in this article, in the iPhone section: "Another notable feature of the iPhone 4S was Siri voice assistant technology, which Apple had acquired in 2010" 178.148.246.169 (talk) 20:19, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Motorola wins patent suit, Europe-wide sales ban on iPhone/iPad
- 9 December 2011, In Germany, Motorola prevails in Apple patent suit, wins Europe-wide sales ban on iOS devices, 9to5Mac
Would this belong in the Apple Inc. article, the iOS article, or the iPhone and iPad articles? -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 13:47, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Article refers to vague terms & itself
For example. "On October 4, 2011, Apple announced the iPhone 4S, which includes an improved camera with 1080p video recording, a dual core A5 chip capable of 7 times faster graphics than the A4, an 'intelligent software assistant' named Siri, and cloud-sourced data with iCloud." How about: "On the 4th of October 2011, Apple announced the next release in the acclaimed "iPhone" series of smartphones called the "iPhone 4S", touting "Siri", an application that integrates client-side hardware with an Apple-hosted server(s), utilizing Nuance's "Dragon Dictation", resulting in both reasonably swift & comparatively accurate interactions between "Siri" & the consumer. Other notable changes in software & design include: a newly-implemented 8Mp camera capable of recording digital videos in 1080p, Apple-backed "iCloud" integration, which offers specific data & storage synchronization, as well as implementing an Apple-branded, dual-core processor dubbed the "A5" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcalight (talk • contribs) 04:09, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Current patent dispute(s) legal stuff
Could we expand a section, to include the current issues regarding Apple, and other companies; namely Google and Samsung, and their patent disputes and outcomes. As this is quite important in regards to technological advancements in the future. Not to mention that a concise list of events would be quite easy to categorise and display.
Or on reflection perhaps create a new page entitled, 'List of legal disputes involving Apple' with a link to this under the 'Culture' section.
--XyZAn (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{Reflist}} template or a <references /> tag; see the help page.
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class Apple Inc. articles
- B-Class iPhone OS articles
- B-Class Macintosh articles
- Macintosh articles
- WikiProject Apple Inc. articles
- B-Class Computing articles
- Top-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- B-Class company articles
- Top-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- B-Class California articles
- Mid-importance California articles
- B-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- High-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Macintosh collaboration
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists
- Selected anniversaries (April 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (April 2008)
- Selected anniversaries (April 2010)