Talk:Archduke Johann Salvator of Austria

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Move to Archduke Johann Salvator of Austria[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was moved. kotra (talk) 23:43, 19 October 2009 (UTC)


Archduke John Salvator of Austria, Prince of TuscanyArchduke Johann Salvator of Austria — He is better known as Johann Salvator than as John Salvator. Modern sources tend to refer to him as Johann Salvator more often than as John Salvator. Regarding the title Prince of Tuscany, it is utterly unnecessary. He held higher and more important titles, such as Prince Royal of Hungary, Prince of Austria and Prince of Bohemia. Surtsicna (talk) 19:06, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move to


Move to Archduke Johann Nepomuk of Austria (Johann Orth)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:59, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Archduke Johann Salvator of Austria (Johann Orth)Archduke Johann Nepomuk of Austria (Johann Orth) — I think there is a common error about this prince of Tuscany. There isn't doubt: his name was Giovanni Nepomuceno, as you can see on the photo of the original baptismal register, which is the archive of the Dome of Florence [1]. It's an original paper: its value is unquestionable. In the name index of the memoirs written by his father Leopold II, "Diario di famiglia in Toscana" (obviously written in Italian), his name is Giovanni Nepomuceno. The children of Leopold and Maria Antonietta had often the name of someone of their relatives: Giovanni was named after John of Saxony, brother of the first wife of Leopold (Maria Anna Carolina of Saxony), best friend of Leopold, and his complete name was (strange?) Johann Nepomuk.Kaho Mitsuki (talk) 08:56, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move to Archduke Johann Salvator of Austria[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. CsDix (talk) 20:28, 5 December 2012 (UTC)



Archduke Johann Salvator of Austria (Johann Orth)Archduke Johann Salvator of Austria — No discussion or consensus for a move to this present title. The first discussion agreed upon Archduke Johann Salvator of Austria not Archduke Johann Salvator of Austria (Johann Orth).--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 15:21, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Support. Move log reads 10:35, 22 February 2011‎ Kaho Mitsuki (talk | contribs | block)‎ . . (62 bytes) (+62)‎ . . (moved Archduke Johann Salvator of Austria to Archduke Johann Nepomuk of Austria (Johann Orth): He wasn't baptised Johann Salvator (see photo of baptismal register)). This is a non-standard disambiguation and the undiscussed move has nothing to recommend it. A bit strange that this wasn't picked up by the subsequent RM discussion above, but it wasn't. Andrewa (talk) 16:09, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Support. Since there are no others here the disambiguator is unnecessary. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:46, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.