Talk:Architecture of Liverpool

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Merseyside (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 


Untitled[edit]

The article gives the impression that The Williamson Tunnels and St James Cemetary are derelict. They are not, bot ave acrive friends groups and the Williamson Tunnels even has a Heritage Centre and is a tourist attraction. Consider changing to reflect these facts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.234.187.158 (talk) 08:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

I can't see how it's misleading. Both the sites you mention were certainly derelict for a long time. The paragraph then goes on to say that they may not be so now, and anyone can click on a link to find out more about each site. RodCrosby (talk) 10:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

The Ancient Chapel of Toxteth[edit]

In the Stuart Architecture section, the sentence on the Ancient Chapel of Toxteth starting "The building is today a ..." seems to say Grade I listed building, but hovering over the "Grade I" link reveals instead Grade II. Which is it? If the "Toxteth Unitary Chapel" page is to be believed, it is Grade I. Presumably "Grade II" was a typo. This should be fixed (by someone who knows more than me). 68.149.182.57 (talk) 04:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)