Talk:Argument from miracles
|WikiProject Philosophy||(Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)|
Now, the article looks like "Criticism of mircles" and not as "Argument from miracles" - it should present the argument itself thoroughly and based on relevant sources, and then have a criticism section of proportional length.--Ioannes Pragensis 14:31, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
I have two suggestions for the article. if no one be disagree i wii perform them in a few days:
- first of all why not using template god arguments instead of two other templates? god arguments has link to page Argument from miracles as the same as two other templates. using these two templates links this article to some irrelevant articles and also repeated ones.
- and second one is that why not using david hume opinions instead of dawkins opinions? hume is a great philosopher and the first one who seriously has criticized this argument.--ایرانی (talk) 13:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC)