Talk:Arguments for eternity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Philosophy (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Time  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

A vacuum is a singularity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.162.45.212 (talk) 20:27, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Last sentence[edit]

I would suggest that the final section of the final sentence of the article, "However, the question still remains that this would mean that either god a) always existed, or b) was created, which effectively comes back to square 1: what created god?" be removed as completley misses the point of God. If God was created, that suggests that there is something more powerful than God, and so God couldn't be God if there was something more powerful than him. Gorillazx1 (talk) 01:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Eternity of the world[edit]

It is the same topic. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:23, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

"Eternity of the world" has such a grand history as a technical phrase that it really needs an article. Arguments for eternity might be subsumed within it, I suppose. Zayasdesign (talk) 12:20, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

I agree, they should be merged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.155.172.170 (talk) 13:40, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

+1 to this, this belongs more to a subsection of "Eternity of the world", which discusses the same topic. Smk65536 (talk) 13:56, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Lost in arguments for what I don't know[edit]

I think it is difficult to apprehend how each of the arguments relate to eternity. Some of them seem to be advocating more for the existence of a God rather than the existence of an eternity. Are these arguments set here to prove that because eternity exists, therefore God must exist? Again, it is all rather pieced together, not very cohesive. Sirwigwam (talk) 08:37, 22 November 2013 (UTC)