Talk:Armstrong Whitworth Atlas

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

There is a WikiCommons image of an Atlas

which might well be worth including, but which raises a couple of questions. (i) Why the triangle well as the fuselage roundel; is that a squadron marking? (ii) The serial appears (it is not quite clear) to be K1836, but that doesn't match Atlas serials as given by Topper in his Putnam book since he has a gap between K1602 and K2514. This last serial was the first of the trainers and the image is certainly not of one of them. Could it be K1536, an Army Co-Op machine? Maybe the answer to (i) would lead to that of (ii).TSRL (talk) 18:14, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]