|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 A |
This article has been rated as A-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
| Project Israel To Do: |
|
Here are some tasks you can do:
- Article requests: HaRav Meir Shehenboim (Etz Hadar), HaRav Moshe Nehemia Cohenov
- Cleanup: One state solution
- Copyedit: Palestinian views of the peace process, Cinema of Israel
- Expand: Guy Bavli, Middle East economic integration, Category:Companies of Israel, Allon Plan, Cellcom, Bezeq, Diamond industry in Israel, Geneva Accord, Zman Tel-Aviv, Ovda International Airport, El Al Flight 426, 2009 Tel Aviv gay centre shooting spree, Standard of Living in Israel, Sephardic Haredim, Rami Kleinstein, Levin Kipnis, Edna Arbel, Ayala Procaccia (from Hebrew), Way of the Patriarchs
- NPOV: Israeli military action in the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict, Six-Day War, Gaza War, 1948 Palestinian exodus
- Stubs: Israel stubs
- Update: Carmel City
- Other:
Translate from Hebrew: Iosif Adler, Isaac Leib Goldberg, Menahem Gnessin, Ohel theater, Ya'akov Zrubavel, Clal Center
Translate to Hebrew: Guy Bavli, Gemara, Chief Rabbi, David Gans, Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary, David Bar Hayim, Jacob of Lissa, Nosson Zvi Finkel, Bezalel Ashkenazi, Solomon Schechter, Av Beit Din, Howard Fast, Guardian of Zion Award, Martin Gilbert, Israeli wine, Uri Davis, Aaron Valero, Mordechai Weingarten
Add geographic coordinates: to articles in Category:Israel articles missing geocoordinate data
Add images: to articles in Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Israel
(Partially) consolidate: Beit Guvrin National Park, Beit Guvrin, Israel, Bayt Jibrin, Eleutheropolis, Maresha. There is also a disambiguation page (Beit Guvrin)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
| A |
This article has been rated as A-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
| A |
This article has been rated as A-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Bottom |
This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
The following editors are available to help with questions about verification and sources in relation to this article:
This in no way implies page ownership; all editors are encouraged to contribute. |
[edit] GA Review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Arrow (missile)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up shortly.
- GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
-
- In the lead, "drawing some debatable criticism." What is meant by "debatable criticism"? Please reword to make clearer. —— ("contested" looks better? Flayer (talk) 00:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC))
- In the Arrow 1 subsection, it says "The Arrow 1 was reportedly a two stage solid propellant missile". Why "reportedly"? —— (no reason, removed. Flayer (talk) 00:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC))
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
-
- Current ref #22 is to another Wikipedia page, which is not considered a reliable ref, especially when discussing "controversial performance" issues.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
This article looks really nice, but there are a couple of small issues that need to be addressed. Once these are taken care of, the article should be good to go for GA status. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 23:49, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you much, I've been waiting quite long for a GA Review! I'll change this ref #22 tomorrow. Flayer (talk) 00:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Fixed! Flayer (talk) 08:54, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Everything looks good, so I'm going to pass this article to GA status. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 17:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] missing references to MDA
This page lacks any reference to the U.S. Missile Defense Agency's role in the program (MDA oversees the U.S. funding for Arrow as part of its broader missile defense portfolio). This is a major oversight and should be corrected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.35.35.34 (talk) 18:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- Corrected. Flayer (talk) 20:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] 100 people personnel
The article mentions it requires a crew of 100 people to operate the system. Even including all technical staff, this figure is about 4 or 5 times too big. 93.173.147.221 (talk) 09:44, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Do you have any reference? Here is the source of the 100 soldiers personnel: [1]. Flayer (talk) 15:08, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
.svg){kind=small}
b (
