Talk:Arrowslit

WikiProject Military history

(Rated C-Class)

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. C This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality assessment scale. Additional information... This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces (general topics): Fortifications task force

Article name

I wonder if "balistraria" is the Latin plural, and the article should in that case be Balistrarium. See http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=F_P5ZM01cFwC&pg=PA283&lpg=PA283&dq=balistrarium&source=bl&ots=G3B4haZCdS&sig=R3JEHYjKQ21vs__Yx2wsncygS5c&hl=en&ei=JFI1SsDdPJG5jAeOi_2FCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5 Richard Keatinge (talk) 22:43, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Never mind that, if balistraria are "more often referred to as an arrow loop or arrow slit",why is the article at balistraria? Nev1 (talk) 02:37, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision to assessment

I've changed the assessment on structure (I presume structure had been redone but no assessment made). However, the coverage of the topic is quite UK-based and could perhaps do with a wider view of the arrow slit in fortification generally, so I've down graded coverage to not met. All in all, it should now assess out as C. Monstrelet (talk) 07:04, 22 May 2013 (UTC)