Talk:Aryan Cargo Express

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted because it meets Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Notability OhanaUnitedTalk page 20:54, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for having to template a regular (and a sysop, at that) but, first, subject matter project pages cannot as far as I know establish notability guidelines and, second, even if they can, that guideline says: "As noted in Wikipedia:Notability, a topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. ... In particular, the following types of topics will almost always have sufficient coverage to qualify: ... All airline companies." I'd suggest that this one-aircraft company does not come within "almost." Moreover, CSD A7 controls here because there is no credible claim of importance or significance made in the article. If you can add even one RS or make such a claim, I'll remove the A7 tag myself. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:01, 12 May 2011 (UTC) PS: See, as to my first point, Wikipedia:POLICY#Role: "Other pages that can be found in the Wikipedia: namespace include ... WikiProject pages.... These pages are not policies or guidelines, although they may contain valuable advice or information." TM 21:09, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am perfectly familiar with the difference between policy, guideline, and essay. But {{essay-project-note}} says "This advice is not a formal Wikipedia policy or guideline, though it may be consulted for assistance during an AfD discussion". Furthermore, the same template says "WikiProjects are encouraged to write essays on notability". Whether an airline company is notable or not does not depend on the number or aircrafts. Here's an article that exerts its notability.[1] OhanaUnitedTalk page 21:27, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I already un-speedy-tagged this once, so I'm not going to do so again. However I was looking into this, and according to the listed source, the company has one plane. Even on the company's own website, I can't find anything to suggest the company actually operates. It's all in future language ("we will do this and that"). So the question is, is a company with one plane notable? --Fang Aili talk 22:26, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aryan Cargo Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not a subsidiary of Air India[edit]

This airline was not a subsidiary of Air India and the cargo division of it was Air India Cargo for the last 2 years or so it was listed as a subsidiary of AI with a frequent flyer programme and alliance? How can a cargo airline have a frequent flyer programme and join a passenger airline alliance? Definitely vandalism.Bingobro (Chat) —Preceding undated comment added 14:27, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]