|Ashurbanipal has been listed as a level-4 vital article in People. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as B-Class.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
Ability to read and write
The claim in the lead section ("He is famous as one of the few kings in antiquity who could read and write") contradicts BBC4's In Our Time - see In Our Time episode - which claims that it wasn't unusual for kings to be educated, although not as educated as Ashurbanipal. Anyone got a citation that suggests otherwise? If not I'll remove the claim. 188.8.131.52 (talk) 16:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
This page biggest problem is lack of citation. Only 2 so far. Their should be at least one citation in every paragraph. Chaldean 05:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
The article contradicted itself on one point. It says:
In 672, upon the death of his queen, Esarhaddon reorganized the line of succession at the instigation of his mother. He used the submission of Median chieftains to draft a treaty.
Ashurbanipal became crown prince in 672, when Esarhaddon's eldest son Sin-iddina-apla died.
That would mean that both Esarhaddons wife and son died at the same year. This needs to be investigated. I’ll delete the second line for the time being because it’s a fragment of a part that gives double information. CAn't you figure this out on your own?! Ily Ethan Shyrock!(: Love Abby Meyer(: 19:30, Djaser 19:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Can someone add this picture to the article since its very relavent. Its also attractive. This picture is from Wikimedia, I am not sure how to downsize it so its the right size for the article []
Here is a list of pictures at the Assyrian Center in San Francisco []
In my opionion I think the second picture on the second link I have provided is the best, perhaps we can incorporate that somewhere in the article intead of the zoomed out image above that does not show as much detail.Ninevite (talk) 22:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
The image Kinadshburn.JPG has incomplete information about its public domain status. It says it is a Neo-Assyrian relief from the British Museum. But there is no info on who took the picture or how it was obtained (the info provided only talks about how it was transferred from English WP to WikiCommons). Theoretically any picture of something with an expired copyright is legal but without chain of custody information it is technically improper to be using this image (e.g. did somebody do something to enhance the image which may actually make the image copyrighted?). Is the info available somewhere?