Talk:Association for Information and Image Management

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Companies (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Contact information[edit]

Are we allowed to divulge contact information in an encyclopedia? (User:Maurice45) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maurice45 (talkcontribs) 18:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Notable[edit]

Are we sure this organization is notable enough for inclusion? If so, this page needs work. A Simple Wiki Nicky (talk) 21:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

"notable enough" ... Yes. AIIM has about 9000 members. The association runs conferences, trade shows and educational programmes. AIIM is active in stadardization - AIIM hosts the ISO TC 171 committee, developped most microsform standards, the ISO 19005 PDF/A and the iECM standard, etc. In Europe AIIM runs the office and operation of the DLM Forum, resposnible for the European records management standard MoReq2. This should be enough relevance. Kff (talk) 13:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
There has been initially a longer text about AIIM, but it was deleted. Please have a look at the history. Kff (talk) 09:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
If AIIM was founded in 1943 and is the leading non-profit organization in the field of managing business information, how could it not be not be notable? For heaven's sake people. Ronz, correct me if I am wrong, but it sounds like you are concerned about the veracity of the article, not the notability of the organization. As a Wikipedia user, I was happy to find this article and more than a bit ticked off to have to dig into the history to find the meat of the article. I say restore it to its 1 February 2009‎ version ‎(about 5,800 bytes instead of 1400 bytes). There is valuable and relevant information that should be made visible. I will restore it myself if no objections within a couple of weeks. 3dimen (talk) 05:43, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Stub[edit]

I trimmed the article down to a stub because the article had been tagged as having no references since Jan 08, and tagged as an advertisement since Mar 08. If we have no independent, reliable sources to verify anything about the association, then we should refrain from expanding the article in ways that once again appear to be advertising. --Ronz (talk) 22:46, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

The content that had been added to the article was a blatant advert; not to mention a copyright violation as it was a straight cut and paste from AIIM's website. I've reverted the changes to purge the problematic text from the article. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 22:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

"the channel"[edit]

What is "the channel"? A wikilink or explanation would be useful. Nicolas1981 (talk) 12:56, 21 July 2009 (UTC)