Talk:Asuka-dera

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Buddhism (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. Please participate by editing the article Asuka-dera, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Japan (Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 21:48, July 25, 2014 (JST, Heisei 26) (Refresh)
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Proposed merge[edit]

Oppose -- In my view, the growth and development of further content is not likely to be enhanced by a merge at this time. Perhaps at some later date when one or both of the articles has been expanded, this issue could be re-visited. --Tenmei (talk) 18:04, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Agree on partial mergers --- I understand the proposed moves are for individual sections within the Asuka-dera article. The present day Asuka-dera and Gango-ji's are totally independent therefore the removal of Gangō-ji section from Asuka-dera article is natural. Isshi Incident is a historical event that better be described in the article for its own, therefore the Isshi Incident section should be removed and merged to Isshi Incident article. The Asuka-dera article itself should survive and focus on its own description. Mantokun (talk) 06:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Agree --- I support edits proposed by Mantokun. This is arguably constructive. --Tenmei (talk) 14:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)