Talk:Atiku Abubakar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

You cannot simply make sweeping statements like "long held suspicion of his alleged greedy and corrupt practices" or "Critics and political commentors say Atiku is one of the most corrupt". You need to say who made the allegations and, if they were proven, where and by whom. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lawsonrob (talkcontribs) 15:16, 16 May 2006.

Neutrality and sources[edit]

I was trying to get more information on the Lagos airport and stumbled across a news article where Abubakar allegedly had been assaulted at the airport. This got me interested in Abubakar, so I checked out his Wikipedia article. It was clear that a lot of work had been put in to it, but also from looking at the article's history, this article's subject was controversial, since there were so many small reversions of different editors' work. Also, I saw it had a lot of "weasel words", usually a sure tip-off that the article needs less POV and more verifiable sources.

There are different little tags you can put after problematic sentences that you think don't meet Wikipedia standards. See the "For inline article placement" section of the page of templates used to mark disputed articles. The {{fact}} tag is an example; placed at the end of a sentence, it produces a little message like this:[citation needed]

I'm not as knowledgeable on Nigeria as most of the other editors but would be happy to help if someone wants a neutral set of eyes to help edit this. You know Wikipedia needs much better coverage of Nigerian topics when Abubakar, one of the continent's most significant figures (like him or not), gets less coverage than some American colleges' football teams.

Cheers, --A. B. 20:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone through the article and removed what i felt were weasel words and POV statements, yet unregistered users continue to add the templates for both NPOV and weasel words, despite my consistent removal of those templates. could this unregistered user please come forward and explain their reasoning as to why NPOV and weasel word templates are neccessary for this page, citing specific statements in the article? i feel the article is sufficiently neutral to manage without them as of now. thanks.--gozar 15:14, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The core matter is that this has controversial statements that are unsourced. I have removed them per WP:BLP. CyberAnth 06:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replacement[edit]

BBC News is reporting that "Nigeria's government has announced that President Olusegun Obasanjo is to replace Vice-President Atiku Abubakar." However there seems to be contention between Obasanjo and Abubakar as to whether the former actually has the powers to do this. Coes anyone know the procedures for this? Timrollpickering 06:48, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[File:a]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.46.245.30 (talk) 16:23, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Atiku Abubakar/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

THE ARTICLE IS SLANDEROUS AND LIBELOUS AND DELIBERATELY SLANTS HISTORICAL INCIDENTS TO DEMONISE ATIKU.

Last edited at 00:16, 18 September 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 08:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Atiku Abubakar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:06, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Loss of Sequence of Events[edit]

I came to notice that the last part of the heading 'Return to the PDP' deals with quite different events. It is explaining Atiku's contest for the 2023 presidential election. I suggest taking that part to a new heading '2023 Presidential Election' which is already provided but contains only the result of the the election. supposed to a fresh head because it Shamsu Rabiu Galadunchi (talk) 07:37, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]