Talk:Atlantic hurricane/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Prelimenary[edit]

Hello! I am just about to begin a review of this page for Good Article status. Any questions can be posted on my talk page, if you need me - Weebiloobil (talk) 08:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


The article is in good shape; only the odd slip-up.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Very well done - only the odd typo in the lead, which I fixed myself
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    My only complaint is reference 3 - it leads to a collection of images and groups, not specifying the job of the United States National Hurricane Centre
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Although there was an excessive amount of edits in the 10 June
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    To improve the article, the actual name of the pics can be sorted out, but this is not a reason for failure
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Congratulations - a very good article

If you wish to begin assessing articles yourself, feel free to head over to WP:GAN