Talk:Attachment in adults

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Psychology (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Family and relationships
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of family and relationships articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 

Released June 29, 2006[edit]

This is part of a modification to the organization of attachment-related pages. kc62301

Close Relationships template[edit]

I created a new template for close relationships. I am putting it on this article to get feedback from others. I do not plan to put it on any other attachment related articles. If the consensus is to remove it from this article, I'm okay with that, too. The template can be added to pages by typing {{Close Relationships}} at the top of an article. (Kelly 04:39, 17 July 2006 (UTC))

Do you mean the listing at the top of the page on the right? If so, I really like that and I'd encourage you to leave it there. DPeterson 13:20, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes. That's it. Kelly 13:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Tag on Essay Unwarrented[edit]

I hold a doctoral degree in the social sciences and feel the tagged section reads like a popular science book would read. This is consistent with Wikipedia standards.

Merge with Attachment Theory[edit]

This article is redundant in many sections and should be merged with Attachment Theory. Anthiety (talk) 06:30, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Many dubious contributions by unidentified editors[edit]

The descriptions of attachment styles have been overrun recently by anonymous IPs adding non-encyclopedic content with no or dubious sources. I have taken a crack at fixing it but more help is needed. Universaladdress (talk) 06:03, 12 August 2012 (UTC)