Talk:Automatic switched-transport network

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Well I think it may be interesting to distinguish between ASTN and GMPLS because ASTN is an architecture and GMPLS a set of protocol, moreover they depend on different standard bodies...

Definitely agree. GMPLS isn't necessarily optical, or at least is agnostic to it if it is passing either time slot information or cross-connect port information. Howard C. Berkowitz 13:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: There's a link to GMPLS on the page, which points back to this page. Is it planned to eventually have a GMPLS article? --80.136.109.4 (talk) 20:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I second the proposal. There should be separate pages for ASTN and GMPLS, as the article is saying that they are not identical.

The division between the two pages would be at the second paragraph: GMPLS consists of several protocols...

--Cgbraschi (talk) 14:23, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Automatic switched-transport network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]