Talk:Aziridine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Chemicals (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Sutton (Rocket Propulsion Elements) says that aziridines are carcinogenic. Does anyone have a good reference? Sutton just mentions it in passing without reference or details. Evand 16:06, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move. Cúchullain t/c 14:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)



AziridineAziridine (functional group) – I would like to edit the current article on the functional group, aziridine, and create an article on the parent compound, ethyleneimine. I also propose that we change the current page on aziridine to a disambiguation page leading to the group and parent compound. This, I believe, will render the ability to add more information that cannot be in its current state, as it would be improper and belonging in a separate article to add the specific information that I would like regarding ethyleneimine. Thanks! ChaseAm (talk) 14:18, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

  • How are group and its own parent compound ambiguous to one another? Disambiguation pages are for unrelated topics sharing the same name. It sounds like what you want to make is a set index. bd2412 T 20:29, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
    • Yes, that would be a better way to put it. Thank you for that point ChaseAm (talk) 00:57, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
  • a disambiguation page is not the way to go, how about aziridines plural for the group? V8rik (talk) 20:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
    • Perhaps placement of the other in the "see also" section in both articles? ChaseAm (talk) 01:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.