Talk:Back in Black (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Signature song[edit]

I noticed that "You shook Me all night Long" was counted as ACDC's signature song, but when you think about it, isn't back in black more their signature song? I mean, when you think of ACDC most people remember Back In Black before You Shook Me All Night Long....could it be possible to swpa the song's places? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaji132007 (talkcontribs) 04:34, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Genre[edit]

It's definitely not heavy metal.

  • First, thanks for putting this in a formatted section. Second, thanks for signing your post. Third, yeah, you're completely right, and All Music Guide, Rolling Stone, Q Magazine, VH1, MTV, Metal-Rules, pretty much every music critic is wrong. We should definitely listen to anonymous Gods of information like you. 70.226.96.31 01:09, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to write like this, your IP is not better in anyway. And yes, it's definitely not heavy metal. AC/DC has never been metal. Calling this song metal is, well, just wrong. It's a blues-based, hard, rock-roll song which makes it a hard-rock song. Blues can be heard in the solo, pentatonic blues scale. Also, the chords are the tonic A, subdominant D and dominant E. Metal, sounds different. I'm removing the metal genre —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.135.29.235 (talk) 21:19, 7 July 2008 (UTC) 108.81.33.59 (talk)[reply]

Who the heck made you correct? Black Sabbath has lots of blues rock songs but that doesn't make them any less metal. That and many bands cited as hard rock were also called heavy metal like Led Zeppelin Kiss Aerosmith etc. Not only that they heavily influenced the metal genre. You obviously don't know what you are talking about. 108.81.33.59 (talk) 17:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And who made you correct? Wikipedia is about consensus, not about who thinks they're most correct. Regarding your edit, Allmusic "styles" are not genres. You have to look at their "genres" field for genres, unsurprisingly. Bretonbanquet (talk) 18:14, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

F word?[edit]

I was listening to this song once, and I suspect this song used the F word in the line "I'm beating the ", Lyricsfreak,com claims tha word they say is "flack{", can anyone tell me how good a source Lyricsfreak.com is? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.3.2.130 (talk) 23:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]


Removed this:

Since the Back In Black section on "The Daily Show" uses a soundalike, not the actual AC/DC song.

Bon's Version[edit]

Has anyone ever heard the Bon Scott version of this song? I dont know when the song was written, but it was obviously sometime before Feb. 19, 1980. Jameywiki 15:15, 26 September 2007 (UTC) I take that statement back. After giving it a critical listen, I think its a good possibility that it is not Bon singing, but maybe a cover band. See the discussion at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bon_Scott Jameywiki 15:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-I thought I have the Bon Scott version- it certainly sounds like him. I thought Bon had already started some of the songs on back in black when he died. Didn't he write the song back in black? It is in my opinion better than the album version- the album version is just a cover version of a Bon song? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.49.160.1 (talk) 14:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also have a song called Back in Black (demo) (bon scott) (very rare). it does sound like a more raspy Bon Scott. The song has a different intro, the mix is not final (if it's a demo, then a very well produced one!). The song has a lenth of 4:30 and has a very Angus-like solo (also different than the one on the album). It's hard to tell if it's a fake or not - I'd go for fake by a tribute band: Live/Wire or Joe Lynn Turner (on the tribute called "Thunderbolt") Saemikneu (talk) 22:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Personnel Heading[edit]

Is Personnel supposed to be listing who played on the main version of the song, as opposed to who wrote it? Given that Bon Scott appears in this list, either that's incorrect and it should read Brian Johnson, or else the Back in Black (album page) should also include Bon under personnel?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eldumpo (talkcontribs) 13:04, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ac-dcsuptouredition.JPG[edit]

Image:Ac-dcsuptouredition.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Information Studies[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2024 and 9 March 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Augustkey (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by JDav39 (talk) 00:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://books.google.com/books?id=OtCGDwAAQBAJ. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. NW1223<Howl at meMy hunts> 03:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]