This page is really quite bad, but I don't have time right now to correct all the factual inaccuracies, let alone place the text in its proper context. My suggestion would be to refer to the UNFCCC website for more information on the Bali Road Map and the subsequent negotiations: http://unfccc.int/meetings/items/4381.php and http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/4577.php. There you'll also see that the Bali Road Map and the Bali Action Plan are not the same thing.
And concerning the comment below on how the Bali conference contributed to climate change: this page is supposed to be about the Bali Road Map, not about the conference at which it was agreed. If at all considered relevant that issue should be discussed at 2007 United Nations Climate Change Conference.
Ok, what's with global climate change conferences having a section on how they contributed to climate change? Obviously they do--pretty much any mass human activity nowadays does. I don't see how the comments on the page are sufficiently notable and NPOV to keep up, but please do respond here in the next couple of days. Thanks!--126.96.36.199 (talk) 00:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
It's because they are hypocrites. It deserves to be in every article that mentions them. If there are multiple articles about them, it should be in all of those articles. Grundle2600 (talk) 19:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)