- 1 Middle Ages
- 2 Etymology
- 3 Human Hair
- 4 Human Hair
- 5 Longbow more powerful than a ballista?
- 6 Last use in combat?
- 7 composite bow
- 8 Size of a ballista
- 9 Gastrophetes
- 10 the two merge requests
- 11 Broken (?) Link
- 12 The Missing Link
- 13 Longbows as sniper weapons
- 14 Blocking
- 15 Lack of In-Line Citations
- 16 Ballistae vs ballistas
The phrase "no anointment" puzzles me: does it refer to lubrication of the machinery, or to 'oiling' the torsion device to prevent - or minimise - the effects of damp which would otherwise reduce the efficiency of the balista? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dawright12 (talk • contribs) 12:14, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
A lubricant/coolant is needed at higher tensions. This is especially true with wood which can become much more abrasive when exposed to heat. The problem with adding the lubricant/coolant (often either water or oil.. but not both) is that some of the material will expand (and later shrink. The expansion requires more monitoring and adjusting. It also causes dual axis accuracy problems. I don't have a source for this other than personal experience and discussions with other hobbyists. KadaganX (talk) 15:30, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
How can a Latin word claim to derive from a Latin one?
- It can, how did WiFi come from Wireless Fiberoptic?
- ITYM "Italian" on the second one, and yes, it doesn't make sense. Dictionary.com gives the etymology as Greek via Latin, so I've updated the article accordingly. DopefishJustin (・∀・) 04:47, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Can someone give a reference to the use of human hair in ballista ropes? It seems unlikely to me. --Carnildo 08:37, 26 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- Since no one has obliged, I've edited out all mention of human hair for now. --Simetrical 01:39, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
I have heard that the ropes use sinews and horse hair, but in a pinch they would use human hair.
i've heard that the hair of blonde women was favoured, but that it was useless when it got wet or humid.
- I can confirm that wet rendered the torsion system less usefull. therefore it was oiled and protected.
blonde could refer to the length and not to the colour. Germanic women were very proud of their long hair, being part of their sex appeal. And like all Germans in these times invested a lot of time in taking care of their hair.
Wandalstouring 19:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Longbow more powerful than a ballista?
"as the .. Longbow, and eventually the Crossbow (learned from the Chinese) were more accurate and powerful"
According to what definition of "powerful" can a longbow outclass a ballista? I suggest to change that paragraph into
"as the Trebuchet and Mangonel were more powerful, while the Longbow, and eventually the Crossbow (learned from the Chinese) were more accurate."
Actually, none of these weapons had the same level of precision of the ballistae. These ancient weapons were the most precise type of catapult ever made and the most sophisticated too. It is impossible to compared the precision of catapults with bows, because bows were operated by hand. Also, it is impossible to say that some type of catapult was more powerful than others.RafaelG
-Removed "(learned from the Chinese)", since no reference is given for this statement, which is dubious since the Romans had a crossbow (the arcuballista) and the Arabs called crossbows "Frankish" bows, suggesting it is more likely the weapon was passed to Western Europe from the Romans rather than the Chinese.
Last use in combat?
Would anyone know the last time a ballista was used in combat? 184.108.40.206 03:48, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Gastraphetes means belly bow what does it have to do with a composite bow and how does a crossbow develop from a composite bow? Every other wiki says Gastraphetes were an early version of crossbows. Wandalstouring 19:32, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Size of a ballista
Main source about siege engines and ballistas: http://members.lycos.nl/onager/history.html
The small versions were called Scorpions: http://members.lycos.nl/onager/scorpio.html http://220.127.116.11/Siege/CatapultaPhotos/Catapulta.htm
The ballista and especially the Cheiroballista were developed into small all-metall versions, a development compareable to the Medieval crossbow.
Wandalstouring 19:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
They made a lot of improvements, and around 400 b.C., they came up with the Gastrophetes. This was a big step forward in siege engineering, since the gastrophetes (or "bellybow") could lauch an arrow further and with more power than an ordinary bow. It couldn't, however, be used for sieges against towns, since a stone wall wouldn't break down because of a little arrow. http://members.lycos.nl/onager/history.html
-> Gastrophetes is no siege engine and all that stuff about not being able to handle this weapon is nonsense.
The real siege engine was called oxybeles http://members.lycos.nl/onager/oxybeles.html
Wandalstouring 19:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
the two merge requests
Broken (?) Link
Under "The cheiroballistra/Manuballista": the external link returns a "403 Forbidden" error.
The Missing Link
Please note, the link for "skeins" only goes to a disambiguation that has no relevant link from there. I would dearly love to know what a skein is in this context so perhaps someone would kindly put a bracketted sub explanation next to the actual word in the opening paragraph or better still, make a whole new entry for it in the encyclopedia and fix a link to it. Kindest regards to all Outofthewoods (talk) 23:30, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Longbows as sniper weapons
At the bottem of the page, it says that the ballista was replaced with crossbows and longbows as sniper weapons. First off, I am fairly certain that longbows were primarily used in only a few countries. Additionally, I know for a fact that medeival archers fired as a unit, while targeting other units, not as individual men firing at other men. I belive the same can be said for men using crossbows, but I am not completely sure.---Obolisk0430 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Obolisk0430 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- The crossbow was more of a sniper weapon than the longbow due to the fact that a long bow had to be fired right after drawing and the crossbow could not and the crossbow was more powerful.-- Lee Tru. 01:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Lack of In-Line Citations
In my opinion, there should be more in-text citations. Past the opening/overview paragraph, there are only one or two citations, and it is unclear where the information is originating from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TriesToFixGrammar (talk • contribs) 03:46, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Ballistae vs ballistas
In the heading section it is said that the plural form is "ballistas" while in the text, we can see "roman ballistae". Now which one of them is correct? As far as I know, if the word is of Latin origin, the plural should be ballistae, and maybe, with an accepted form (especially in US) of ballistas (MS Word gives me ballistae). But English is not my first language so I'm not in a position to correct this. Apass 18.104.22.168 (talk) 22:24, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ballistae is the proper Latin plural form however (sadly) that is becoming more and more un-importaint.-- Lee Tru. 01:08, 18 April 2013 (UTC)