|WikiProject China||(Rated Stub-class, High-importance)|
Some parts of this article is an extract from the cited sources. It is necessary that the article be revised.
This article is filled with dubious claims - Infrared radiation that help circulation? Negative ions? Please! This material doesn't belong in an encyclopedia! I am tempted to delete most of this material, but I would like to see other editor's input before doing so. Observer31 19:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
I totally agree. Take this statement: " friendly properties to environment."??? Whats that supposed to mean. It would be good for this article to be cleaned up. --Dumbo1 12:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
I feel that more a more credible source is required for all claims pulled from the document "Manual for Bamboo Charcoal Production and Utilization" . Unfortunately, I have been unable to find any, though I am unable to check any Chinese language studies. Biscuitduchat (talk) 10:40, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
I have removed large chunks of the article - particularly in the "health benefits" section - an improperly sourced, non-encyclopedic, or just plain incomprehensible. More cleaning is needed, but I'll pause to see if any better sources appear shortly. -- MarcoTolo 04:38, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you - I was hesitant to go ahead by myself, but I think it is clear there is consensus here. I'm not sure the tag is still necessary, I will look at it again and remove it. Observer31 01:33, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, I think the proper edit for this particular section should either be to simply remove it or at least remove 'Bamboo Vinegar' as the entry for Pyroligneous acid notes 'wood vinegar' (Pyroligneous acid) is not unique to bamboo charcoal production. Butcherboy1 (talk) 07:51, 10 November 2011 (UTC)