Talk:Battle of Brașov

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Hungary Low‑importance

	Hungary portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Romania Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Help Romania reach at least GA-status
- Help History of Romania get WP:GOOD
- Request an article or create a missing one
Assess :
- Assess all articles tagged for this project that have not been assessed for quality
Cleanup :
- Review the Romania-related cleanup listing
- Normalize the use of "Northern Bukovina" (capitalized) and "Northern Bessarabia" (Bessarabian part of Chernivtsi Oblast) all over Wikipedia
Disambiguation :
- Disambiguate project articles and get points
Expand :
- Expand Postage stamps and postal history of Romania
Translate :
- Translate Romania-related articles from the Romanian Wikipedia
- Translate and keep in sync with the project versions in other languages: Projet:Roumanie (in French), Proiect:România (in Romanian), Проект:Румыния (in Russian)
Unreferenced : * Add more reference to FC CFR Timișoara.
Other :
- Make use in articles of the newly contributed images (about 5800!!) from the Wiki Loves Monuments Romania 2011 (WLM Romania external site)
- Review newly created Romania-related articles
- Check the articles needing expert attention or other work, and help with some of the items
- Create Awards for WikiProject Romania
- Contribute photos related to Romania at Commons:WikiProject Romania. Organize Romania related images on Commons. See also media-related tasks

Title[edit]

In case of a renaming, the title Battle of Kronstadt should also be considered (it may be the most common) Transerd (talk)

If the article needs renaming, start the process, but the form that was , "or, or" is really strange. The main name should follow the article name, others are added according to wiki practice. Adrian (talk) 23:40, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Romanian article about the battle contains several maps. Do we use these in the English version? --Norden1990 (talk) 23:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean the wikipedia version in Romanian? I don`t see any maps[1] ?Adrian (talk) 00:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, I confused this with the Battle of Şelimbăr. --Norden1990 (talk) 01:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those maps are interesting but without any sources. I don`t know if it would be wise to use them.Adrian (talk) 12:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If the majority of users wants to use this maps I have nothing against since it doesn`t contain any controversial data, but if used, it must be indicated that it lacs sources.Adrian (talk) 12:56, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]