Talk:Battle of Hareira and Sheria

Disruptive editing - changing the names of units fighting the battle

The names of units used by the official British Historian have been changed without saying where the new names come from. These changes have been hidden under cover of generic rubrics. Here [1] under cover of the rubric "‪Adding/removing wikilink(s) Copyedit (minor)‬)" The the 24/Welch was changed to the 24th Battalion, Royal Welch Fusiliers referring to the 24/Welch as Fusiliers when Falls refers to the 25th Battalion as Fusiliers, not the 24th. More name changes to units here along with the call for a citation needed when a citation has been given because the editor claims without citing a source Dalbiac the divisional historian is wrong. [2] still under the rubric of ‪Adding/removing wikilink(s) Copyedit (minor)‬). More name changes here [3] and here [4] and here [5] and here [6] all under the rubric ‪Adding/removing wikilink(s) Copyedit (minor)‬) with more name changes here [7] being described as ‪Copyedit (minor)‬) and further name changes here [8] and here [9] again under the rubric ‪Adding/removing wikilink(s)‬) still without any sources being quoted.

These disruptive edits continued here [10] under the rubric ‪Copyedit (minor)‬) when more units names were changed. Still more name changing here [11] The editor continues name changing here [12]. In order to reestablish the integrity of this article, all these edits should be rolled back.

Under the rubric "brig eng" the editor changed direct quotes here [13] which I have undone. See [14] for more disruptive edits changing Battalion to BN under the rubric "Battalion = BN" without any explanation and [15] with the rubric "Battalion =BN not sure of this reads well maybe Bn would work better." This is Wikipedia not experimental editing.

These are all disruptive edits which someone should explain to the editor who made them, that are wrong and should be corrected. I have reinstated these posts because the issue is a very serious one - changing the names of the units from those which appear in the sources quoted. This is not a personal attack on the editor concerned but raises serious concerns about the integrity of the article after the names of the units have been changed. --Rskp (talk) 01:52, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

These are not disruptive edits but minor copy edits changing a word or two and correcting errors if you truly believe these are disruptive, and not just article ownership problems, I suggest you go to RFC or ARBCOM Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

As I've said I am concerned with the integrity of the article when names of units have been changed from those referred to in the sources used to describe the action, giving room for the possibility of a disconnect which deeply worries me. --Rskp (talk) 02:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Hareira and Sheria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110316151433/http://www.awm.gov.au/collection/war_diaries/first_world_war/subclass.asp?levelID=1454 to http://www.awm.gov.au/collection/war_diaries/first_world_war/subclass.asp?levelID=1454

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 16 July 2017 (UTC)