This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
A note states that this article is heavily based on Kronoskaf. This strikes me as problematic, since it is largely a user-generated website. While there is a case to be made, that this website is better than others, it is still largely user-generated. Even if they have a vetting policy, we have no way of assessing who is writing what and if it has any editorial oversight that should otherwise permit its widespread use. Furthermore, I have already corrected one article that has used Kronoskaf, because people who cite it don't appear to be checking the sources that Kronoskaf itself uses, which is also problematic. So, I will flag this article appropriately. Maxx-♥talk and coffee ☕ 15:19, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
