Talk:Beginner Books

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Children's literature (Rated Stub-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Business (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject New York City  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

List of 200 books[edit]

This information is inappropriate for this entry. Others may view it as appropriate for a sub-article (I don't) but I think it's uncontroversial that it doesn't belong here. Bongomatic 09:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Vandals[edit]

Half of the books in the complete list are fakes. Delete the fakes NOW. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.119.71 (talk) 23:23, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

I don't know how the above editor came to the conclusion, but it is obviously wrong. The first three, for example, are:
If there are, in fact, any errors in the previous formulation, they should be addressed specifically. Bongomatic 10:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Many young hoaxers seem to enjoy messing with this page. For instance, recently user:98.200.3.90. It's worth keeping lists like this particularly for the redlinks for works that don't yet have their own article or section elsewhere, but requires monitoring. – SJ + 23:24, 13 June 2014 (UTC)