Talk:Belarc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Wondering why this page was redirected? 03:21, 18 September 2007 Jreferee (talk | contribs) deleted "Belarc" ‎ (CSD A7 No assertion of importance/significance. CSD G11 Blatant advertising.) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log"

Looks like many other companies with similar products have pages. ie Spiceworks, etc.

Is it OK to create the page again? Sumint (talk) 22:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


Maybe merging all similar pages. Doing so would end the "blatant advertising" objection and generate links to the page (it currently lists as orphan). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.63.90.132 (talk) 16:14, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Here is a list of external references: http://www.google.com/search?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=belarc&oe=utf-8&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=bks:1&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wp

For instance, The IT Regulatory and Standards Compliance Handbook: How to Survive - Page 407.

As a sysadmin who uses Belarc's products I do feel they are notable in the WP:NOTE sense and article should not be merged. It should be made more neutral. It should link to a larger article on remote license and security management tools.

Scanlyze (talk) 19:58, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Belarc Advisor and software keys[edit]

If you google "Windows XP Professional" "Belarc Advisor Current Profile" key: you can pull vast numbers of software keys. Belarc is (in)famous for this. Surely this article should mention the nefarious uses of Belarc reports? Tim —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.23.136.200 (talk) 10:43, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

I have just installed and run this program and was surprised to see a list of software keys. Perhaps the information should not be dumped unsolicited. However the listing claims to not be transmitted to any other webserver (and yes, there are MANY other sorts of server :). There now follows a rant. If people allow information of this nature to go online, then all it demonstrates that even the most wonderful security software is only as good as the person using it. End of rant. In any case most XP licence keys are tied to a particular PC. If I scrounge a key that was used for registering an HP desktop, and use it for a Toshiba laptop, Microsoft ought to not recognise it as a genuine installation. Corporate keys are a different matter, they can be used to register any number of XP installs, and the PC does not contact the hive mind. However you would expect these bodies corporate to employ better sysadmins, who would not leak the information? On a more positive note, many users do wish to recover their software keys, for legitimate purposes, and this tool is at least as trustworthy as some of the programs on offer. Rugxulo (talk) 20:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)