Talk:Betty (Adventure Time)

Betty (Adventure Time) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 22, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed

Cartoon Network Low‑importance

	Cartoon Network portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cartoon Network, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Cartoon Network on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cartoon NetworkWikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkTemplate:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkCartoon Network articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Betty (Adventure Time)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Quenhitran (talk · contribs) 09:34, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take up this one. Everything seems solid, so I presume that it won't take long.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

General template, specific comments follow.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 09:43, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Further comments

Last sentence of lead section: the word "episode" was used repeatedly, which doesn't sound natural. Can you fix it?
They have been cut down.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:44, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Events" subheading: "both are voiced by Tom Kenny" => both were voiced/both voiced?
Fixed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:44, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"As such, he wants to create a portal to the past and apologize to his fiancée Betty for making her leave him; Hambo, filled with sentimentality, is the key to the portal." I'm not sure if the semicolon works in this case. Split it into two sentences may help, I guess, or use another linking.
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:44, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What does this mean: "Maurice LaMarche also reprises his recurring role as Grand Master Wizard; he also voices Belle Noche"? Perhaps this needs some other linking words.
I tried to make this a little clearer. He voices a recurring character, and a new character.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:45, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Reliable sources: you use a number of Tumblr, Twitter and Instagram posts as sources without "verfied" marks. For a GA to be passed it's not necessary, but you are encouraged to replace it with alternatives whenever possible.
Well, a good chunk of those sources (the Instagram and Twitter) are from Jesse Moynihan, and are even linked on his website (www.jessemoynihan.com). The Tumblr is the official production crew Tumblr. Does Tumblr do the 'verified' thing?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:44, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's it. I've done some minor fixes by myself. ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 10:08, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great, GA now!

GA toolbox
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions