Talk:Big Painting No. 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Big Painting No. 6 has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
WikiProject Visual arts (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
 
WikiProject Comics (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Big Painting No. 6/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 04:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

  • All issues addressed. Passing the article! Statυs (talk) 16:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Way too much copyrighted material in the footnotes. No excuse for this. Editor should have used his own words. MathewTownsend (talk) 23:39, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Removed non-free image by Dick Giordano[edit]

This image by Dick Giordano is not discussed in the text. It is merely mentioned. There is no explanation as to exactly how this image relates to Big Painting No.6 in the text as required by the non-free image rationale. It is a serious issue for wikipedia to replication another's copyrighted work without a proper rationale. And it is especially serious as this work by Dick Giodonao was originally in five articles on specific works by Roy Lichtenstein. (now down to three articles on a work by Lichtenstein) MathewTownsend (talk) 18:48, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

suggest merge[edit]

Suggest merge with parent article Brushstrokes series. See discussion at Brushstrokes series - Merger discussion. Thanks, MathewTownsend (talk) 22:09, 27 July 2012 (UTC)