Talk:Big Top (video game)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Video games (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)
The levels are all very well designed and they seem to give Big Top an addictive quality. The graphics simply sparkle, and it is not difficult to find oneself going for just one more level after several hours of intense play. The user will find himself holding his breath as he makes ridiculous jumps to avoid enemy clowns, grab the ring's last remaining hat, or make a break for the hidden exits. It is a fast-paced, entertaining little play that is surprisingly satisfying and well done.

This sounds like blatant advertising for the game and not a neutral point of view at all. JIP | Talk 10:17, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure no one is advertising an MS-Dos game from 1983. That said, this is an awfully written article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.33.1.37 (talk) 19:57, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm sure that the intent of this page's author was not to promote this "ancient" video game but only to provide usefull information on something related to "pc game archeology". Even if not well written, I enjoyed to find an aritcol on Wikipedia which deals with a distant childhood memory! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.33.175.49 (talk) 21:37, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:37, 18 July 2013 (UTC)