Talk:Big business

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Business (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

This absolutely needs to be put on a disambiguation page. There are too many different random facts etc, on here to not be. Spawn Man 02:21, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Disagree with this one, "Big Business" is a nebulous concept and a vague one, yet readers do have a single picture in mind when they talk about "Big Business". People may disagree on the precise definition but it's not actually ambiguous, just poorly defined.
This could be fleshed out with varieties of "Big Business," such as "Big Media." Also, it could include a history of the use of the term. Big business is a concept that's well-known and in the popular vernacular. I do agree that this page has too many random facts, but it's just poorly written. Arttechlaw (talk) 09:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

See Also List[edit]

There was a big list of See Also links (most of which did seem relevant) and now they are gone. Since the concept of "Big Business" is vague, it seems that a long list of See Also links is reasonable. 121.91.48.146 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 23:17, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

GM?[edit]

General Motors isn't really a good example anymore. I'm replacing it with toyota

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 05:45, 21 October 2011 (UTC)


Big BusinessBig business

Per WP:CAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 04:19, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

  • Support. Not a proper noun, should not be capitalised as such. Also, the majority of reliable sources do not treat capitalise it, especially in more recent times. Jenks24 (talk) 01:37, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.