Talk:BitlBee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject IRC (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject IRC, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Internet Relay Chat on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Apple Inc. (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Macintosh, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 

Find sources[edit]

Find sources: "BitlBee" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images

You can help find more. --Hm2k (talk) 10:01, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Added other protocols supported in newer bitlbee versions[edit]

I added a quick note about twitter, facebook chat, ggoogle talk, identi.ca and status.net support. Also, added a note about support for libpurple library in development branches. Plus, linked "official bitlbee wiki" from 'External Links' section. Also, moved reference to "IRC hacks" book to "further reading section". Fine now? JainAmber (talk) 13:06, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Assessing a source reliable[edit]

In addition to the above, Vladi has written two articles on perl.com [1] [2], has been cited twice [3] [4], and seems to have been a busy developer [5]. WP:RS says these aren't enough. But that blocks the goal of building an encyclopedia, so, per WP:IAR, I say Vladi has expertise in software, and since freshmeat might have editors and an editorial policy, the above article is reliable enough to cite. --Lexein (talk) 16:41, 31 July 2011 (UTC)