This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Another film[edit]

The King of the Bla Bla Bla

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blah (disambiguation) → Blah — Blah is currently a soft redir to Wiktionary. This dab page can do the same thing since it has the {{wikt}} box to link to the Wiktionary entry. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Comment, this is a useless dab page anyway. If WP:MOSDAB were applied properly, most of the articles on it wouldn't even be here. Only 2 of the entries could be commonly referred to as just "Blah", the political party and Moses Zeh Blah. "Bla" and "Blaa" shouldn't be on here either. 90.219.50.171 (talk) 02:02, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support if there is a dab page, it should reside at the primary location instead of any soft redirect to wiktionary. If there is a soft redirect to wiktionary, I think it should always try to be converted into a dab page. 65.94.253.16 (talk) 04:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. older ≠ wiser 23:59, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support move but I also concur that it seems questionable whether the disambiguation page is necessary. But putting the "soft redirect" at the primary topic is silly -- an encyclopedia is not a dictionary and should not be expected to offer information on every single usage of every single word. Propaniac (talk) 17:23, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Editing[edit]

It won't let me edit anything

Scar4151 (talk) 14:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is because the article was vandalized. Please see Wikipedia:Vandalism for more details. Hope that helps. (For 1 year, the user does not have a response.) 98.230.2.23 (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 May 2021[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Note: Protected by Anthony Appleyard on 2011-03-26: "Persistent vandalism" ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Why this protected 68.126.204.92 (talk) 23:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]