Talk:British Summer Time

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Time (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Dates[edit]

Shouldn't there be a section telling what dates the actual time changes take place? I know on other articles it lists the starting and ending date for the Daylight Saving Time switches? —Preceding unsigned comment added by RTHonVDS (talkcontribs) 14:28, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

The quoted wording of The Summer Time Order 2002 makes the dates clear enough. 82.163.24.100 (talk) 19:36, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

GDT[edit]

The reference to "Greenwich Daylight Saving Time (GDT)" should be removed. The term GDT is not used in Britain, other than by ill-written operating systems of foreign origin. And the variation of the clocks in Europe is not in general, and is not in Britain, called "Daylight Saving Time"; it is called "Summer Time". 82.163.24.100 (talk) 19:36, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Indeed - I shall act upon your suggestion. Colonel Warden (talk) 09:39, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

When does BST start and finish ?[edit]

I find it hard to believe that the "Summer Time Order 2002" actually means anything. It states that BST and GMT start and finish at 01:00 hrs. Most TV and Radio stations will tell you that is when you should do the clock change. However, anyone that has a "radio-controlled" clock or watch, that receives the ( MSF - 60 KHz ) time-signal transmitted by Arqiva from Anthorn, Cumbria will witness that BST and GMT still start and finish at 02:00 hrs NOT 01:00 hrs. Who is right ? Telephoneman1959 (talk) 02:52, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

The time changes from 01:00 GMT to 02:00 BST, and from 02:00 BST to 01:00 GMT. My radio-controlled watch does just that. Joseph Myers (talk) 21:18, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

That's interesting Joseph. Our MSF clocks are very cheap affairs that have very little on-board intelligence. I would expect that they do only what they are told by the transmission. Maybe watches such as yours, which are probably quite recent, will have some form of intelligence in it's firmware. It would be nice if someone that has full knowledge of the MSF time signal could describe how it is used by these clocks and watches. Telephoneman1959 (talk) 23:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Radio controlled clocks and watches tend to be programmed to sync with the signal on the hour every hour. The time signal transmits the full time and date information each minute. I have two devices: a clock that receives the signal every hour, and a watch the receives the signal at 1:00 GMT each day (and failing this, retries each hour for the next few hours). Therefore, both devices will respond to the change in summer time at the correct hour. The MSF Time Date Code specification does however say that a sort of "warning bit" is set for 61 minutes before the change in summer time to warn clocks that a change is imminent. My watch certainly went forward at 1:00 GMT on Sunday. Of course, if you have poor signal reception, the device may fail to set the time at 1:00 and may re-try at 2:00, and therefore show the wrong time for the intervening hour.
I don't quite see your argument anyway. The Summer Time Order 2002 states that summer time is, "The period beginning at one o'clock, Greenwich mean time, in the morning of the last Sunday in March and ending at one o'clock, Greenwich mean time, in the morning of the last Sunday in October." So radio controlled clocks move forward at 1:00 GMT and go back at 2:00 BST, which is quite correct. I don't see that the clocks require any extra intellegence. If they change when the signal indicates, they will switch to summer time at the correct hour. JRawle (Talk) 10:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the above information... I was not aware I was arguing at all, just giving the facts about two analogue MSF clocks I have, that always go forward at 02:00 hrs on the day when BST starts. I reckon I have had them about 15 years. We have a reasonable signal-strength, they never fail to go forwards or backwards. They did it when the signal came from Rugby and they still do it now that the signal comes from Anthorn. Until I read this page I was unaware that the dear-old government had changed the time at which BST started from 02:00 hrs to 01:00 hrs in 2002! Now I know that, and that all the TV and radio and newspapers are not wrong, it won't worry me anymore... I'll just have to remember that my clocks are behind for an hour from 01:00 hrs until 02:00 hrs on "BST Day" ! Telephoneman1959 (talk) 01:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

British Summertime redirect[edit]

I changed this from a redirect to the novel of the same name to this page since I believe more people are going to search for this subject rather than the book (especially now the topic of whether or not to bring Britain into line with CET is now up for discussion). I have also put a dablink to that article from here so people will still find it. Cheers TheRetroGuy (talk) 15:07, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Update template[edit]

As far as I know, the Private Member's Bill has now been passed, and the Coalition government are planning to release a statement regarding changing to CET this week. 2.102.76.28 (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The Daylight Savings Bill is at the second reading stage. It'll still be a long time before it's even passed. In addition, the bill is not for an immediate change, but for an analysis of the effects of such a change, followed by a trial period if that analysis is favourable.
As such, it's my opinion that the update tag should probably be removed until the bill is actually passed. If anything, it only deserves a brief mention until that point, since if it isn't passed, it will pretty much become completely irrelevant immediately.
--AllenJB (talk) 22:38, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
As the original edit was incorrect, I've removed the update tag, leaving the article otherwise unchanged. Mhardcastle (talk) 09:33, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Footnote 8 Reliability[edit]

Footnote 8 is technically properly quoted, but may be a bit misleading. The source is an MP politicking. He does claim that '1000 people a day were killed or seriously injured.' Then just a few sentences later he changes his assertion to 'killed or injured.' Wouldn't it be more accurate and encyclopedic to find the source of the data he's paraphrasing and actually quote it? It would remove the 'hearsay' aspect of the assertion, and possible selective use of facts in a political debate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.179.45.40 (talk) 12:28, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Why?[edit]

The article doesn't really explain the reasons why BST was introduced, or why it is still maintained. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:48, 27 October 2012 (UTC)