Talk:Broadcasting House

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject BBC (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal. WikiProject icon
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject London (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
WikiProject icon A version of this article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to help in the drive to improve articles. Visit our project page if you're interested in joining! If you have questions, please direct them to our talk page.


Does this article need to be merged with the main article BBC? Svest 07:34, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)

Probably not. I know this is an old comment, but I'm still answering your question either way. I think this article is notable enough to stand alone. --WikiFanaticTalk Contribs 1:11, 28 Sep 2005 (CDT)

Neutral POV[edit]

Are we sure this is a neautral POV article? A modern mind can't fully comprehend how miraculous and transformative Radio was in the early 20th century. The architecture of Broadcasting House reflects those intense early attitudes about Radio, Progress and Science. That doesn't sound wholly neautral to me. --Silex 12:48, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Internal Links Added[edit]

I have added Internal Links to this article. Kathleen.wright5 08:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

And I've RVed them - as I've said elsewhere - many seem unnecessary & just toooo many redlinks created!
Please don't create redlinks (look here) or link every other common word in articles..... Zir 20:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Underground Platform[edit]

Does the article really need this speculative section on it? The only reference is to a website that concludes that there is no real hard evidence of it's existence. KlickingKarl (talk) 13:11, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

The myth of the link to the Underground is debunked in Mark Hines excellent book - The Story of Broadcasting House —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 10:36, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

I agree this is not really needed. The speculation generally comes from a stairway which led down from the old World War Two air shelter, called the "Stronghold". This was under the extension and wasted much of the space below ground as the rooms were too small and the walls too think to do anything with it except use it for minor store rooms and echo chambers. In fact, the stairway led to a sewage pump which serviced the male and female lavatories which the stronghold had, should staff have to remain there for long periods. It might be worth while mentioning the Stronghold, only in that it was quite a major task to demolish it when BHX was knocked down. Stephen.redburn (talk) 15:13, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Building Design[edit]

The original building was not completed to its designed extent before the war. There was to be a wing roughly over the bunker, an extension of the façade, designed by the original architect, which is detailed in the below book.

London's secret Tubes 979-1854142831 —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 22:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Restructuring 12/5/11[edit]

I have just finished restructuring the page so that it contains more information and so that the parts about the renovation make sense, as before some were confusing as to what was occuring where. I hope i have cleared it up.

Please feel free to change what i have done, however i have tried to do it as best i can.

all information from the following sources. It doesn't citate everywhere due to time restrictions:

Regards --Rafmarham (talk) 20:44, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

File:BBC Breathing.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]


An image used in this article, File:BBC Breathing.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:41, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Broadcasting House Room 101[edit]

This entry states that George Orwell based his Room 101 in "1984" on a conference room in Broadcasting House, yet under the entry for Bush House, where Orwell worked during WW2, it states that Room 101 is there. These two statements cannot both be right, but they may both be wrong.

Sean O'Connell - (talk) 21:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Ironic art work[edit]

Considering that almost all the BBC's presenters from the 60s and 70s are eventually going to be banged up for being sex cases, shouldn't it be noted that the writing been on the wall for the BBC since its headquarters opened in the 1920s? Quite literally in fact because the exterior statues were designed by Eric Gill, a most glorious British Establishment pervert who often raped his daughters while reciting the passages from the Bible, however it has never been clarified whether he did this when he also sodomised his pet dog, too!! (talk) 10:54, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Although you do make a genuine point (that Eric Gill was a well-known sex offender) I'm not entirely sure what you aim to achieve by wrapping it up in the way you have. Do you want this information put on the page? Or are you just venting a fairly obvious contempt for the BBC? In either case, this talk page is somewhere to discuss the article in question, and not post idle gossip or speculation as you have done. Similarly, opinions should never be apparent in a Wikipedia article, and your statement that "the writing has been on the wall for the BBC" is purely opinion. All available facts at the moment show that (although the BBC may be in a bad way) it's not about to shut up shop altogether. Aw16 (talk) 12:28, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Title of page[edit]

Everyone in the media is referring to the new building as "New Broadcasting House", yet the Wikipedia page with that title refers to the BBC's former north-west of England headquarters. Shouldn't the main reference be to this page? (talk) 09:05, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Very good point. I suggest the page for the Manchester building be renamed "New Broadcating House (Manchester)" and that "New Broadcasting House" become a redirect to this article. -- Alarics (talk) 09:20, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done. Has the building been officially renamed though? If so it would seem more sensible to retitle this page and set up "Broadcasting House" as the redirect. GDBarry (talk) 08:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
It looks as if Broadcasting House is still the official name. The BBC itself refers to "the new Broadcasting House" (with a small n) but also, at the same time, just to Broadcasting House. See I have the impression that "New Broadcasting House", if it is the official title of anything, perhaps means just the new part of the building. I think we had better leave this article title unchanged. -- Alarics (talk) 08:59, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I've added a sentence to the introduction to clarify this. GDBarry (talk) 09:33, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Registered Office[edit]

Although this is the BBC HQ building, it is not the registered office. As a check with Companies House will confirm, as a body incorporated by Royal Charter rather than a registered company, the concept of 'registered office' does not apply to the BBC. Mauls (talk) 21:41, 8 December 2013 (UTC)