Talk:Brown Hill Creek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The title of the photograph is incorrect. There is no Brown Creek. It is properly known as Brownhill Creek. I lived there for about 15 years.

Can someone please advise me who took/submitted the attached photograph? I would like to be able to contact them. Thank you.RonTed 08:40, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See the information at the image source page.--cj | talk 15:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brown Hill Creek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:47, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Map needed[edit]

This article along with other waterway articles could really do with a map showing the current and historical route of the creek from the Hills to where it joins the Patawalonga River Alex Sims (talk) 00:51, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alex, agreed. If you want to know how I figured out the current official path of the creeks in the area, check out figure 7 on page 207 of the Brownhill & Keswick Creek Stormwater Plan 2016 (https://bhkcstormwater.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/bhkc20160311d-smp-figures.pdf). It was originally linked from City of Mitcham website, but now missing, which I linked to in the Keswick Creek article but probably should be linked here too. A tracing (or some other Copyright-free extraction) of the map would be great here in Wikipedia if you had the time. Donama (talk) 00:28, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking that an appropriately highlighted OpenStreetMap image would do. There is also the option of BSIcons e.g. Commons:BSicon/Catalogue/watercourses/non-navigable, although that looks fun, tricky and maybe not that useful. Alex Sims (talk) 12:53, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
River Avon, Bristol has both sorts of maps, probably only need the map map rather than the route map, still nice to aim for Alex Sims (talk) 13:02, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]