Talk:Buck Rogers in the 25th Century (TV series)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gil Gerard thought it was going to be a cartoon.[edit]

I remember seeing Gil Gerard on some talk show shortly before the series first season started. He told about how he turned down the role because he didn't want to be the voice of a cartoon character and that it took his agent a while to get him to understand it wasn't going to be a saturday morning cartoon. I'll leave it up to the big TV addict Wikipedians to ferret out what talk show it was and exactly what Gil Gerard said. Bizzybody (talk) 08:51, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gerard may have thought it was going to be "cartoonish" comic book character (i.e. not serious), but not necessarily a literal cartoon. 88.104.19.70 (talk) 02:10, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Harris arranged and co-composed the theme[edit]

--Boogiejuice (talk) 15:44, 19 February 2012 (UTC)confirmed by JH--Boogiejuice (talk) 15:44, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Buck Rogers should be split[edit]

I believe that there is enough info for Buck Rogers in the 25th Century (film). Its uneccesary to have all the the information merged here. Dwanyewest (talk) 17:14, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced there is enough information to warrant a separate article since much of the information would be duplicated in this article anyway, but even if there was enough it doesn't necessarily mean there should be one. Even though it got a theatrical release, the 1979 Buck Rogers movie was made as a TV pilot, not as a feature film. It is directly tied into the TV series. Having said that, since almost every major sci-fi series has a separate article for each and every episode, then I don't see why not - although it would possibly mean doing an article for each and every episode of Buck Rogers. 88.104.17.141 (talk) 05:12, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

I believe Twiki and Dr. Theopolis should merged both are characters without third person sources to support them. Dwanyewest (talk) 13:05, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Although they're not huge articles, there's probably too much in them to merge them into this one. As there doesn't appear to be one at the moment, I'd recommend starting a "list of Buck Rogers25C characters" article page. It can include all the main recurring characters as well as guest characters. L@zloFeelot@lk 13:08, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Buck Rogers in the 25th Century (TV series)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The DVD release info was inaccurate. It stated the the pilot episode on the DVD was the theatrical version and not the TV version, which did not include some added scenes for the TV version. This was wrong. I had actually just finished watching the pilot from the DVD and it was the TV version that was on the DVD and not the theatrical release. As the article mentioned, the TV version added some scenes and deleted some scenes from the theater version. For example, the TV version deleted Tiger Man's death and added a scene at the end in which Buck was invited to be a part of the Directorate. Both of these scenes were on the pilot episode version that is on the DVD.

Last edited at 11:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 10:28, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Buck Rogers in the 25th Century (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blu-ray presentation[edit]

The article says that some material is "upscaled from 1.33:1 SD". Does the writer mean that the original programme is now in HD, or does he mean that the 4:3 original has been cropped and zoomed to fill a 16:9 screen? (There's too much of that going on). G7mzh (talk) 11:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That section was a little too long and read more like an amateur review than an Wiki entry, so I've condensed it. 31.49.239.77 (talk) 06:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]